Skip to main content

A Review of “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026)”

 

image

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple is the fourth entry in the 28 Days Later film series and the second in the 28 Years Later trilogy. I did enjoy aspects of the previous entry, 28 Years Later, but I admit that I came away feeling somewhat disappointed. With this next installment not being directed by Danny Boyle but instead by Nia DaCosta, I had some concerns. Were these worries unfounded, or is this a worthy sequel?

image

There are two main plotlines: the Jimmy Gang and Dr. Ian’s research. The tonal-whiplash cliffhanger involving the “Jimmy Gang” from the previous film had me concerned, particularly with how ridiculous they initially appeared. However, this film succeeds in making the Jimmy Gang feel genuinely disturbing and threatening. There is a strong focus on one of the gang’s raids on a human settlement, and it results in a truly unsettling sequence of scenes. This contrasts sharply with Dr. Ian, who returns as a much more prominent character in this entry and anchors the research storyline. This is easily the more interesting of the two plots, as it follows his strange friendship with the Alpha Zombie, Samson, from the previous film. It is weirdly entertaining and surprisingly heartwarming to watch this relationship develop. The film effectively explores the juxtaposition of humanity’s cruelty through the Jimmy Gang and humanity’s empathy through Dr. Ian. The inevitable collision between these two paths is tense and impactful.

image

Dr. Ian is a genuinely compelling character. Watching this deeply compassionate man attempt to keep hope alive while the world slowly grinds him down is engrossing. Nia DaCosta’s confident direction and Ralph Fiennes’ performance convey an immense amount of character depth with minimal dialogue. Fiennes is phenomenal, bringing remarkable subtlety and nuance to the role, and he delivers an absolute standout moment in the final act. Jack O’Connell is also excellent as Sir Jimmy, infusing the human villain with an unpredictable, unsettling, and almost childlike energy that makes him deeply disturbing. Chi Lewis-Parry is a surprising standout as well, as he is given more room to imbue the Alpha Zombie with personality this time around.

image

Alfie Williams returns as Spike, and despite having less screen time in this entry, he once again delivers a strong performance. His character completed a coming-of-age arc in the previous film, learning how to survive against the infected. The Bone Temple presents him with the next logical challenge: witnessing the cruelty of humanity firsthand. You truly feel for Spike, as he seems genuinely terrified of Sir Jimmy and his gang, and you find yourself rooting hard for him to escape. One of the more notable members of Jimmy’s gang is Jimmy Ink, played by Erin Kellyman. She brings a balance of toughness and empathy that aligns well with the film’s themes. Her interactions with Spike add a much-needed sense of heart to the Jimmy storyline.

image

Nia DaCosta’s decision to shoot on digital cameras rather than iPhones is noticeable. Visually, the film looks far better, with cleaner, clearer shots throughout. The cinematography captures both the eerie atmosphere and the beauty of the locations more vividly. While the zombies felt somewhat underwhelming in the previous entry, the few zombie set pieces featured here manage to make them feel frightening once again.

image

That said, the film is definitely lacking in zombie set pieces overall. Most of them appear in the first act, and afterward they are largely absent, aside from Samson. At times, you may almost forget that the story is meant to take place during a zombie apocalypse. I also found the cult elements to be less engaging. It’s a concept that has been explored extensively in other films and shows, and this movie doesn’t do much to differentiate its take. Additionally, because this storyline has to share the runtime with the far more compelling Dr. Ian plot, the Jimmy Gang doesn’t receive enough development. As a result, Jimmy’s followers feel largely like disposable fodder. Even Erin Kellyman’s Jimmy Ink ultimately comes across as simply “the nicer one,” without much added depth.

image

My final gripe is admittedly nitpicky, but the film lacks much of the energetic flair that defined Danny Boyle’s style. There are no especially dynamic visuals, rapid editing, or surreal flourishes, which makes this entry feel more visually standard. While there is some effective use of licensed music, Hildur Guðnadóttir’s score is ultimately not very memorable.

image

Overall, The Bone Temple ended up being far better than I expected. This series continues to take big risks, and this time I think they paid off. Nia DaCosta does an impressive job of imprinting her own style onto the franchise while still respecting its core themes. The ending is also far more hopeful than anticipated, and I’m genuinely excited and optimistic about the third entry in the 28 Years Later trilogy.

 


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A “QUICK!” Review of “Kandahar (2023)”

  This is a 2023 action movie about a US operative having to fight his way out of Afghanistan with his interpreter while being hunted. Wait isn’t that the same plot as Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant? It’s a little weird that this movie came out just a month after The Covenant with almost the same plot. The 3rd act and the ending is also VERY similar. The difference comes in execution and unfortunately, Kandahar isn’t as good. The first hour is incredibly slow as it setups the whole plot but it takes ages. The relationship between the main lead and the interpreter isn’t that strong. The message isn’t delivered in a very meaningful way. There is also not a lot of action set pieces even though there is a stellar night sequence in this one. It’s just another passable movie starring Gerald Butler.

A Review of “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021)”

  I once said after watching Black Panther, that it would be cool if there was an all Asian cast similar to it. There were some all Asian cast movies like Crazy Rich Asian (2018), but that is a romcom, and Mulan (2020), but that was bad. In comes Shang Chi which is the first Asian lead Superhero movie ever. The premise is “Martial-arts master Shang-Chi (Simu Liu) confronts the past he thought he left behind when he’s drawn into the web of the mysterious Ten Rings organization”. So does Shang Chi succeed in giving us a good all Asian cast big blockbuster or is it just another failed attempt? Firstly, the action sequences and choreography are some of the best from Marvel since Captain America and the Winter Soldier (2014). Martial arts are the focus of the action scenes in Shang Chi and they are beautifully choreographed. We get the classic wire-fu/floating style of Crouching Tiger but we also get some Jackie Chan style with the utilization of the environment for the a...

A Review of “Wicked: Part I (2024)”

  I am not the biggest fan of musicals and it is the one genre in movies I rarely watch. I knew of the popularity of the Broadway show “Wicked” but I never brought myself to ever watch it. Now, there is finally a movie adaptation of the show. I did enjoy the legendary 1939 film “The Wizard of Oz” and a prequel about the Witch is an interesting idea hence why I gave it a shot. Does this movie defy gravity or is it wickedly bad? Firstly, the production of this film is phenomenal. The song and dance numbers are all incredibly choreographed. It is impressively visually seeing close to 100 people all dancing in unison. The songs and dance feel very flamboyant and campy but it works in the film. In terms of the actual songs, I liked a fair amount of them, especially “Defying Gravity” at the end. I also appreciate how this movie uses lots of actual practical set design. It makes the world of Oz feel more real and believable. There are some genuinely huge-looking sets in this...