Skip to main content

A Review of “Mickey 17 (2025)”

 

image

Five years after winning Best Picture for Parasite, Bong Joon-ho returns with Mickey 17. The big question is: does this live up to his previous work, or is it a disappointing step down?

image

What initially drew me to this movie was its intriguing concept. The idea of a person whose sole job is to die repeatedly for the sake of humanity—thanks to cloning technology—is both fascinating and disturbing. For the most part, the film explores the political, religious, and ethical dilemmas that would arise if such technology existed. Bong Joon-ho uses this premise to craft a sharp satire on American politics while exploring deeper themes about identity and what makes us truly human. The writing is strong, filled with clever comedic moments, subtle jabs, and a genuine message. At its core, Mickey 17 also functions as a quiet coming-of-age story for its protagonist, leading to a satisfying and well-earned conclusion.

image


Visually, the film is stunning. The production design—from the sets to the costumes and even the CGI—is impressive. The ship’s muted colors and claustrophobic layout reinforce Mickey’s status as a disposable worker, making his existence feel suffocating. This contrasts beautifully with the planet Niflheim, which is bright and open, creating a striking visual juxtaposition. The alien designs are both grotesque and strangely adorable, a testament to Bong’s ability to balance the bizarre with the endearing.

image

Robert Pattinson delivers a phenomenal performance as both Mickey 17 and Mickey 18, giving each iteration a distinct personality. His chemistry with himself is oddly compelling, and he also shares strong on-screen moments with Naomi Ackie, who plays his love interest. Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette are a delight as the film’s over-the-top, egomaniacal antagonists, fully embracing the darkly comedic tone.

image

That said, their performances might be divisive. Ruffalo and Collette lean into cartoonish villainy, which contrasts with the relatively restrained performances of the rest of the cast. Given the film’s dark comedic edge, I think it works, but some viewers may find it jarring. Additionally, supporting characters played by Steven Yeun and Anamaria Vartolomei are saddled with underdeveloped subplots that feel tacked on rather than essential. Vartolomei’s character, in particular, seems to be heading toward a revenge arc that never fully materializes, and both their storylines are wrapped up in an unsatisfying manner.

image


If I had any nitpicks, I wish we had seen more of Mickey’s past deaths, considering he’s died 16 times before the film’s events. The movie establishes that each clone has a slightly different personality, but rather than showing this, it’s mostly told to us. There’s also an expository scene explaining why having multiple clones is forbidden, featuring a backstory so compelling that I almost wished that were the film instead.

image


Overall, Mickey 17 is a fun and thought-provoking addition to the sci-fi genre. While it doesn’t fully capitalize on its ambitious concept, the story it tells remains engaging and entertaining. It works as both a popcorn flick and a film with meaningful themes. Plus, Robert Pattinson doing another funny accent is always worth the price of admission.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A “QUICK!” Review of “The Prosecutor (2024)”

  The Prosecutor is an interesting film, as it’s actually a legal-focused thriller first and foremost, with the martial arts action coming second. I found this blend of genres to work surprisingly well, and I give Donnie props for trying something different. The movie features a phenomenal opening action sequence and an incredible climactic one too. When it comes to the action scenes, you definitely won’t be disappointed. However, the legal aspect—which makes up the majority of the film—is unfortunately a bit lacklustre and predictable. I wish the courtroom scenes had explored more of the complexities of the justice system and delivered more intense drama. It didn’t help that the villain was incredibly one-dimensional. Still, it’s an entertaining action movie overall, and this film does show that Donnie knows how to handle action.

A “QUICK!” Review of “65 (2023)”

  I love Dinosaurs I also love Sci-Fi However, this Dinosaur and Sci-Fi movie doesn’t work. There is barely any plot, barely any character depth, and a severe lack of dialogue. I don’t know why the writer made the characters unable to speak the same language because it just hinders the character interactions. They don’t even explain what mission our main character was on and why the girl was there. It also has a lot of questionable things such as why a futuristic ship couldn’t sense an asteroid belt, yet the main character has a sensor that works great on the ground. The director and writer don’t make us care enough about anything. So you should not care to watch this.

A “QUICK!” Review of “Heart Eyes (2025)”

  Heart Eyes has the makings of a really cool modern slasher character. The killer’s design is pretty cool, and the concept of killing couples on Valentine’s Day is a novel idea. The movie even starts off well with some creative kills. However, the movie goes downhill from there. It turns into an incredibly corny romcom—the dialogue is sappy, and the characters feel cartoonish. The movie then whiplashes between romance and horror, as if suddenly remembering there’s a killer on the loose. At one point, in the middle of a chase, the characters start opening up to each other—which was definitely not the time. Meanwhile, the killer becomes increasingly incompetent, failing to take out the main characters. The comedy doesn’t land, the romance is bland, but the kills are at least enjoyable. Just don’t go into this expecting a full-on slasher horror movie.