Skip to main content

A Review of "IP Man 2 (2010)"

 

image

I remember watching Ip Man 2 and loving it after watching it. Now after rewatching it again, I came out feeling rather different than the first time I watched it.

image

Starting with what this movie improves upon is the much bigger action. Sammo Hung returns as the choreographer for this movie but also as a new character “Hung Chun-nam” who is an arch-nemesis of sort and rival for IP man. For example, in the first film IP man fights 10 people but what if fought dozens of them or the fight against the martial artist on the table. These fights are exciting, thrilling and very creative such as in the fight with the use of the environment and wooden board to create interesting choreography. The introduction of western boxing against Chinese martial art makes for an amazing fight and Sammo Hung utilize both styles in a great way for fluidity vs brutality. The different styles of Chinese martial arts are also blended very well which allows for fluid interplay between the contrasting styles.

image

Another improvement is that within these fights, IP Man feels like he is in danger. In the first movie, IP man always dominates every fight without any real issue which worked for the movie but as the audience, we never really felt like IP Man was in danger. He fights the martial art master Hung Chun-nam (Sammo Hung) who rival IP Man in speed and power. When IP Man was fighting dozens of men who had knives at the same time it felt to us the audience that it was even too much for him to cope as he had to try and retreat. The boxer “Twister” played by Darren Shahlavi (who sadly passed away January 2015) is more ferocious and physically stronger than IP Man.  I give props to Darren for giving a very arrogant and narcissistic performance to make him very hateable to the audience. The final fight against Twister is 11 minutes of fist curling excitement and is an amazing fight.

image

While the fights are “bigger” there not necessarily better per se. IP man 1 had a more grounded and realistic fight which is what made the first movie very unique whereas IP Man 2 uses over the top and cartooney sorts of fights. IP Man 2 utilizes a lot more wirework which is very noticeable. Additionally, a fair amount of supporting character’s performance (especially the  British actors) are cartoonishly bad and just feel dumb.

The story is also very weak when compared to the first movie. The movie centres on IP Man’s struggle to start a martial art dojo in Hong Kong as he is challenged by cartooney martial art masters. The second half then becomes a Chinese remake of Rocky IV with his fight against the British and racist boxer twister. IP Man also gives a speech that ends racism which is similar to Rocky ending the cold war in Rocky IV. Some of the returning characters from the first movie such as  Chow Ching-chuen (Simon Yam) IP Man’s friend who is now amnesiac and Kam Shan-Chau (Louis Fan)  a robber who has now mended his ways feel very irrelevant in the overall narrative. They don’t add much to IP Man’s character and honestly just feel like they are there to make people go “oh remember him from the first movie!” and that is rather disappointing. Furthermore, the first movie invoked a more intense struggle with the World War 2 invasion but this movie focuses more on Chinese pride and that results in a cliche message at the end. IP Man never really goes through a character arc like the first movie which makes the story irrelevant for his character as well.  

There is one good aspect of the story that I wished was kind of explored a bit more or focused upon which is the relationship between IP Man and Wong Leung (Huang Xiaoming) his first student. His student actually goes through a character arc with his relationship with IP Man causing him to improve himself. There is only a couple of scenes where its just IP Man and Leung but they are great non-action moments that show IP Man’s wisdom being used to help others. Sadly, this is kind of tossed away once the boxer Twister comes though…

image

Overall, I am surprised after rewatching this movie. It was not as great as I remember it. While the fights are more flashy and bigger, it doesn’t have the same charm as the more brutal and grounded fights of the first movie. The story was surprisingly not great but despite all that I kind of enjoyed this movie still. This movie is more reminiscent of older martial art movies instead of doing something different like the first movie. Doing something that is already done but doing it great isn’t necessarily bad. This movie has it’s own charms and if you just take it as its own thing then its a really good martial art movie. However, it is a sequel and when I think of it like that then it does make me feel slightly disappointed. In the end, its a good martial art movie and you will still come out of it having a good time.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A “QUICK!” Review of “The Prosecutor (2024)”

  The Prosecutor is an interesting film, as it’s actually a legal-focused thriller first and foremost, with the martial arts action coming second. I found this blend of genres to work surprisingly well, and I give Donnie props for trying something different. The movie features a phenomenal opening action sequence and an incredible climactic one too. When it comes to the action scenes, you definitely won’t be disappointed. However, the legal aspect—which makes up the majority of the film—is unfortunately a bit lacklustre and predictable. I wish the courtroom scenes had explored more of the complexities of the justice system and delivered more intense drama. It didn’t help that the villain was incredibly one-dimensional. Still, it’s an entertaining action movie overall, and this film does show that Donnie knows how to handle action.

A “QUICK!” Review of “65 (2023)”

  I love Dinosaurs I also love Sci-Fi However, this Dinosaur and Sci-Fi movie doesn’t work. There is barely any plot, barely any character depth, and a severe lack of dialogue. I don’t know why the writer made the characters unable to speak the same language because it just hinders the character interactions. They don’t even explain what mission our main character was on and why the girl was there. It also has a lot of questionable things such as why a futuristic ship couldn’t sense an asteroid belt, yet the main character has a sensor that works great on the ground. The director and writer don’t make us care enough about anything. So you should not care to watch this.

A “QUICK!” Review of “Heart Eyes (2025)”

  Heart Eyes has the makings of a really cool modern slasher character. The killer’s design is pretty cool, and the concept of killing couples on Valentine’s Day is a novel idea. The movie even starts off well with some creative kills. However, the movie goes downhill from there. It turns into an incredibly corny romcom—the dialogue is sappy, and the characters feel cartoonish. The movie then whiplashes between romance and horror, as if suddenly remembering there’s a killer on the loose. At one point, in the middle of a chase, the characters start opening up to each other—which was definitely not the time. Meanwhile, the killer becomes increasingly incompetent, failing to take out the main characters. The comedy doesn’t land, the romance is bland, but the kills are at least enjoyable. Just don’t go into this expecting a full-on slasher horror movie.