Skip to main content

A Review of "IP Man 2 (2010)"

 

image

I remember watching Ip Man 2 and loving it after watching it. Now after rewatching it again, I came out feeling rather different than the first time I watched it.

image

Starting with what this movie improves upon is the much bigger action. Sammo Hung returns as the choreographer for this movie but also as a new character “Hung Chun-nam” who is an arch-nemesis of sort and rival for IP man. For example, in the first film IP man fights 10 people but what if fought dozens of them or the fight against the martial artist on the table. These fights are exciting, thrilling and very creative such as in the fight with the use of the environment and wooden board to create interesting choreography. The introduction of western boxing against Chinese martial art makes for an amazing fight and Sammo Hung utilize both styles in a great way for fluidity vs brutality. The different styles of Chinese martial arts are also blended very well which allows for fluid interplay between the contrasting styles.

image

Another improvement is that within these fights, IP Man feels like he is in danger. In the first movie, IP man always dominates every fight without any real issue which worked for the movie but as the audience, we never really felt like IP Man was in danger. He fights the martial art master Hung Chun-nam (Sammo Hung) who rival IP Man in speed and power. When IP Man was fighting dozens of men who had knives at the same time it felt to us the audience that it was even too much for him to cope as he had to try and retreat. The boxer “Twister” played by Darren Shahlavi (who sadly passed away January 2015) is more ferocious and physically stronger than IP Man.  I give props to Darren for giving a very arrogant and narcissistic performance to make him very hateable to the audience. The final fight against Twister is 11 minutes of fist curling excitement and is an amazing fight.

image

While the fights are “bigger” there not necessarily better per se. IP man 1 had a more grounded and realistic fight which is what made the first movie very unique whereas IP Man 2 uses over the top and cartooney sorts of fights. IP Man 2 utilizes a lot more wirework which is very noticeable. Additionally, a fair amount of supporting character’s performance (especially the  British actors) are cartoonishly bad and just feel dumb.

The story is also very weak when compared to the first movie. The movie centres on IP Man’s struggle to start a martial art dojo in Hong Kong as he is challenged by cartooney martial art masters. The second half then becomes a Chinese remake of Rocky IV with his fight against the British and racist boxer twister. IP Man also gives a speech that ends racism which is similar to Rocky ending the cold war in Rocky IV. Some of the returning characters from the first movie such as  Chow Ching-chuen (Simon Yam) IP Man’s friend who is now amnesiac and Kam Shan-Chau (Louis Fan)  a robber who has now mended his ways feel very irrelevant in the overall narrative. They don’t add much to IP Man’s character and honestly just feel like they are there to make people go “oh remember him from the first movie!” and that is rather disappointing. Furthermore, the first movie invoked a more intense struggle with the World War 2 invasion but this movie focuses more on Chinese pride and that results in a cliche message at the end. IP Man never really goes through a character arc like the first movie which makes the story irrelevant for his character as well.  

There is one good aspect of the story that I wished was kind of explored a bit more or focused upon which is the relationship between IP Man and Wong Leung (Huang Xiaoming) his first student. His student actually goes through a character arc with his relationship with IP Man causing him to improve himself. There is only a couple of scenes where its just IP Man and Leung but they are great non-action moments that show IP Man’s wisdom being used to help others. Sadly, this is kind of tossed away once the boxer Twister comes though…

image

Overall, I am surprised after rewatching this movie. It was not as great as I remember it. While the fights are more flashy and bigger, it doesn’t have the same charm as the more brutal and grounded fights of the first movie. The story was surprisingly not great but despite all that I kind of enjoyed this movie still. This movie is more reminiscent of older martial art movies instead of doing something different like the first movie. Doing something that is already done but doing it great isn’t necessarily bad. This movie has it’s own charms and if you just take it as its own thing then its a really good martial art movie. However, it is a sequel and when I think of it like that then it does make me feel slightly disappointed. In the end, its a good martial art movie and you will still come out of it having a good time.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A “QUICK!” Review of “Kandahar (2023)”

  This is a 2023 action movie about a US operative having to fight his way out of Afghanistan with his interpreter while being hunted. Wait isn’t that the same plot as Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant? It’s a little weird that this movie came out just a month after The Covenant with almost the same plot. The 3rd act and the ending is also VERY similar. The difference comes in execution and unfortunately, Kandahar isn’t as good. The first hour is incredibly slow as it setups the whole plot but it takes ages. The relationship between the main lead and the interpreter isn’t that strong. The message isn’t delivered in a very meaningful way. There is also not a lot of action set pieces even though there is a stellar night sequence in this one. It’s just another passable movie starring Gerald Butler.

A Review of “Wicked: Part I (2024)”

  I am not the biggest fan of musicals and it is the one genre in movies I rarely watch. I knew of the popularity of the Broadway show “Wicked” but I never brought myself to ever watch it. Now, there is finally a movie adaptation of the show. I did enjoy the legendary 1939 film “The Wizard of Oz” and a prequel about the Witch is an interesting idea hence why I gave it a shot. Does this movie defy gravity or is it wickedly bad? Firstly, the production of this film is phenomenal. The song and dance numbers are all incredibly choreographed. It is impressively visually seeing close to 100 people all dancing in unison. The songs and dance feel very flamboyant and campy but it works in the film. In terms of the actual songs, I liked a fair amount of them, especially “Defying Gravity” at the end. I also appreciate how this movie uses lots of actual practical set design. It makes the world of Oz feel more real and believable. There are some genuinely huge-looking sets in this...

A Review of “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021)”

  I once said after watching Black Panther, that it would be cool if there was an all Asian cast similar to it. There were some all Asian cast movies like Crazy Rich Asian (2018), but that is a romcom, and Mulan (2020), but that was bad. In comes Shang Chi which is the first Asian lead Superhero movie ever. The premise is “Martial-arts master Shang-Chi (Simu Liu) confronts the past he thought he left behind when he’s drawn into the web of the mysterious Ten Rings organization”. So does Shang Chi succeed in giving us a good all Asian cast big blockbuster or is it just another failed attempt? Firstly, the action sequences and choreography are some of the best from Marvel since Captain America and the Winter Soldier (2014). Martial arts are the focus of the action scenes in Shang Chi and they are beautifully choreographed. We get the classic wire-fu/floating style of Crouching Tiger but we also get some Jackie Chan style with the utilization of the environment for the a...