A “QUICK!” Review of “The Running Man (2025)”

I adore Arnold Schwarzenegger’s 1987 Running Man film. It’s incredibly cheesy and far from a faithful adaptation of the book, but it’s enjoyable dumb-popcorn fun. I was hesitant about a remake, but knowing it was directed by Edgar Wright, best known for the Cornetto Trilogy and Baby Driver, made me more open to it.

However, this new film lacks nearly all of Edgar Wright’s personality. The sharp editing, high-energy pacing, creative transitions, and playful visual flair are all missing. It feels like it could have been directed by anyone. Even though it’s more faithful to the book, there are some jarring changes, especially in the final act, that really dumb the film down. The humour also falls flat, which is surprising coming from Edgar.

The Running Man (2025) ultimately ends up as a serviceable action flick, which is fine, but not what I hoped to see from Edgar after four years.

Comments

A “QUICK!” Review of “The Prosecutor (2024)”

The Prosecutor is an interesting film, as it’s actually a legal-focused thriller first and foremost, with the martial arts action coming second. I found this blend of genres to work surprisingly well, and I give Donnie props for trying something different. The movie features a phenomenal opening action sequence and an incredible climactic one too. When it comes to the action scenes, you definitely won’t be disappointed. However, the legal aspect—which makes up the majority of the film—is unfortunately a bit lacklustre and predictable. I wish the courtroom scenes had explored more of the complexities of the justice system and delivered more intense drama. It didn’t help that the villain was incredibly one-dimensional. Still, it’s an entertaining action movie overall, and this film does show that Donnie knows how to handle action.

A “QUICK!” Review of “65 (2023)”

I love Dinosaurs I also love Sci-Fi However, this Dinosaur and Sci-Fi movie doesn’t work. There is barely any plot, barely any character depth, and a severe lack of dialogue. I don’t know why the writer made the characters unable to speak the same language because it just hinders the character interactions. They don’t even explain what mission our main character was on and why the girl was there. It also has a lot of questionable things such as why a futuristic ship couldn’t sense an asteroid belt, yet the main character has a sensor that works great on the ground. The director and writer don’t make us care enough about anything. So you should not care to watch this.

A “QUICK!” Review of “Heart Eyes (2025)”

Heart Eyes has the makings of a really cool modern slasher character. The killer’s design is pretty cool, and the concept of killing couples on Valentine’s Day is a novel idea. The movie even starts off well with some creative kills. However, the movie goes downhill from there. It turns into an incredibly corny romcom—the dialogue is sappy, and the characters feel cartoonish. The movie then whiplashes between romance and horror, as if suddenly remembering there’s a killer on the loose. At one point, in the middle of a chase, the characters start opening up to each other—which was definitely not the time. Meanwhile, the killer becomes increasingly incompetent, failing to take out the main characters. The comedy doesn’t land, the romance is bland, but the kills are at least enjoyable. Just don’t go into this expecting a full-on slasher horror movie.

MovieRankingReviews

Search This Blog